LANDS OF THE EARTHQUAKE: FROM RECONSTRUCTION TO RE-INHABITING The “non-fragile” survival unit, capable of proceeding by trial and error, is constituted by the complex “organism-in-its-environment” and is comparable to an “urban bioregion” that pursues a co-evolutionary balance between human settlement and environment. Fragility of the complex and territorial fragility therefore coincide, and seismic fragility is nothing more than one of its forms. It is therefore not a question of “reconstructing”, but of “re-inhabiting” the places subject to seismic events, through the reactivation of co-evolutionary processes based on economies connected to “territorial heritage” identifiable, producible and reproducible only by “territorial heritage communities”. The prevailing anti-seismic and antifragile territorial policies are, on the contrary, still tainted by a sort of centralistic obsession and, even in their most advanced version (SNAI), they still cannot access an indispensable autopoietic interpretation of the place-based approach paradigm.
L’unità di sopravvivenza “non-fragile”, capace di procedere per tentativi ed errori, è costituita dal complesso “organismo-nel-suo-ambiente”, ed è assimilabile a una “bioregione urbana” che persegue un equilibrio co-evolutivo fra insediamento umano e ambiente. Fragilità del complesso e fragilità territoriale quindi coincidono e la fragilità sismica non è altro che una sua forma. Non si tratta quindi di “ricostruire”, bensì di “riabitare” i luoghi soggetti ad evento sismico, tramite la riattivazione di processi coevolutivi basati su economie connesse ai patrimoni territoriali, che solo le “comunità di patrimonio territoriale” possono identificare, produrre e riprodurre. Le politiche territoriali antisismiche prevalenti, e in generale antifragili, sono viceversa tuttora viziate da una sorta di ossessione centralistica e, anche nella loro versione più avanzata (Snai), non riescono ancora ad accedere a un’indispensabile interpretazione autopoietica del paradigma del place-based approach.
Le terre del sisma: dalla ricostruzione alla riabitazione
luciano de bonis
2020-01-01
Abstract
LANDS OF THE EARTHQUAKE: FROM RECONSTRUCTION TO RE-INHABITING The “non-fragile” survival unit, capable of proceeding by trial and error, is constituted by the complex “organism-in-its-environment” and is comparable to an “urban bioregion” that pursues a co-evolutionary balance between human settlement and environment. Fragility of the complex and territorial fragility therefore coincide, and seismic fragility is nothing more than one of its forms. It is therefore not a question of “reconstructing”, but of “re-inhabiting” the places subject to seismic events, through the reactivation of co-evolutionary processes based on economies connected to “territorial heritage” identifiable, producible and reproducible only by “territorial heritage communities”. The prevailing anti-seismic and antifragile territorial policies are, on the contrary, still tainted by a sort of centralistic obsession and, even in their most advanced version (SNAI), they still cannot access an indispensable autopoietic interpretation of the place-based approach paradigm.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
