Introduction The relationship between autoimmune hemolytic anemia and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome has never been systematically addressed. Methods Systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed databases performed according to PRISMA guidelines from inception to March 2020; meta-analysis performed by Peto's odds ratio for rare events. Findings Forty-five studies with different outcomes met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence (PP) of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) positivity was greater in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than controls (20.2% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.001, I2?>80%; I2 = heterogeneity), particularly in hemodialysis patients (18.3% vs. 8%, I2 = 0%). The PP of lupus anticoagulant was greater in ESRD than controls (8.7% vs. 0.2%, P?

Antiphospholipid antibodies in end-stage renal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Arcaro, Alessia;Gentile, Fabrizio
2020-01-01

Abstract

Introduction The relationship between autoimmune hemolytic anemia and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome has never been systematically addressed. Methods Systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed databases performed according to PRISMA guidelines from inception to March 2020; meta-analysis performed by Peto's odds ratio for rare events. Findings Forty-five studies with different outcomes met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence (PP) of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) positivity was greater in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than controls (20.2% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.001, I2?>80%; I2 = heterogeneity), particularly in hemodialysis patients (18.3% vs. 8%, I2 = 0%). The PP of lupus anticoagulant was greater in ESRD than controls (8.7% vs. 0.2%, P?
https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12847
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/93518
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact