BACKGROUND: Psoriasis management in elderly may be difficult, mainly due to comorbidities and concomitant medications. The aim of this study was to compare elderly and non-elderly psoriatic patients in relation to their demographic, clinical and molecular characteristics. METHODS: A prospective observational study on 502 psoriatic patients attending our outpatient clinic was performed. We analyzed their de-mographical and clinical features, highlighting differences in comorbidities and treatment adverse events. Moreover, real-time PCR was used to analyze lesional skin expression of CCL-20, HBD-2, Hpt, IFN-α, IL-Iβ, IL-8, IL-23A, IL-33, IL-36γ, TGF-β, TNF-α, S100A7 and VEGF, in 15 adults and 15 elderly. RESULTS: The two groups of patients differed for comorbidities and treatment profile. Particularly, non-elderly were treated more frequently with biologic drugs compared to elderly. However, elderly did not develop more metabolic, hepatic and/or renal abnormalities than younger patients. Serious adverse events were comparable between elderly and non-elderly. No difference in gene expression of the investigated mediators was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show substantial clinical or molecular differences between elderly and non-elderly Older patients should be treated with systemic drugs when required. Safety and tolerability profiles of biological drugs seemed at least comparable with those of traditional systemic ones.

Psoriasis in elderly and non-elderly population: Clinical and molecular features

Napolitano, Maddalena;Balato, Nicola;
2016-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis management in elderly may be difficult, mainly due to comorbidities and concomitant medications. The aim of this study was to compare elderly and non-elderly psoriatic patients in relation to their demographic, clinical and molecular characteristics. METHODS: A prospective observational study on 502 psoriatic patients attending our outpatient clinic was performed. We analyzed their de-mographical and clinical features, highlighting differences in comorbidities and treatment adverse events. Moreover, real-time PCR was used to analyze lesional skin expression of CCL-20, HBD-2, Hpt, IFN-α, IL-Iβ, IL-8, IL-23A, IL-33, IL-36γ, TGF-β, TNF-α, S100A7 and VEGF, in 15 adults and 15 elderly. RESULTS: The two groups of patients differed for comorbidities and treatment profile. Particularly, non-elderly were treated more frequently with biologic drugs compared to elderly. However, elderly did not develop more metabolic, hepatic and/or renal abnormalities than younger patients. Serious adverse events were comparable between elderly and non-elderly. No difference in gene expression of the investigated mediators was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not show substantial clinical or molecular differences between elderly and non-elderly Older patients should be treated with systemic drugs when required. Safety and tolerability profiles of biological drugs seemed at least comparable with those of traditional systemic ones.
http://www.minervamedica.it/en/getpdf/5iqFz073qFzOTI5vUrrim75rvJZOIPL1eDYTgqbEwjxsUt4tIz3mY3vEhtv%252B1IevIN1QptmEAbjpJa%252BS294npg%253D%253D/R23Y2016N06A0587.pdf
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/74902
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact