This paper examines in what way Hegel deals with the representation of God's properties, with particular reference to two traditional problems : The problem of their compatibility and the problem of the equivocality or univocity between Divine and human attributes. The following hypotheses will be defended : Hegel refuses the pretention of knowing God by attributing him many predicates - which he considers the fundamental mistake of the rational theology - but he doesn't considers all the divines attributes as representations which have no speculative value and have also to disappear in the transition from the religious Representation to the Concept ; he affirms on the contrary the correspondence between the predicates of omnipotence, goodness, justice and wisdom with the determinations of the Concept ; the speculative transposition of these attributes has to be regarded as a constitutive part of Hegel's theodicy, because it represents a reply -Alternative to Leibniz's one -T o Bayle's anti-Theodicy, grounded on the affirmation of an insoluble contradiction between divines goodness, justice and all-power ; finally, the clarification of the dialectic relationship that Hegel establish between God's justice and wisdom -T hrough their speculative interpretation -Allows to gain a clear view on the way he conceives the relationship between human and divine justice, which is here examined through an analysis of his interpretation of Job's book.
La transposition spéculative des attributs divins et la « véritable théodicée » de Hegel
PICARDI, Roberta
2016-01-01
Abstract
This paper examines in what way Hegel deals with the representation of God's properties, with particular reference to two traditional problems : The problem of their compatibility and the problem of the equivocality or univocity between Divine and human attributes. The following hypotheses will be defended : Hegel refuses the pretention of knowing God by attributing him many predicates - which he considers the fundamental mistake of the rational theology - but he doesn't considers all the divines attributes as representations which have no speculative value and have also to disappear in the transition from the religious Representation to the Concept ; he affirms on the contrary the correspondence between the predicates of omnipotence, goodness, justice and wisdom with the determinations of the Concept ; the speculative transposition of these attributes has to be regarded as a constitutive part of Hegel's theodicy, because it represents a reply -Alternative to Leibniz's one -T o Bayle's anti-Theodicy, grounded on the affirmation of an insoluble contradiction between divines goodness, justice and all-power ; finally, the clarification of the dialectic relationship that Hegel establish between God's justice and wisdom -T hrough their speculative interpretation -Allows to gain a clear view on the way he conceives the relationship between human and divine justice, which is here examined through an analysis of his interpretation of Job's book.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.