The article reconstructs Modigliani’s and Simon’s close collaboration over the 1950s on implementation of a decision theory under uncertainty that partly contributed to the genesis of Behavioral Economics and Rational Expectations theory. Their collaboration reveals how the shared identification of uncertainty as a major problem, their similar interpretation of rationality as the ability to select and use relevant information, and their embrace of certain methodological norms for the construction of economic theory (that it should be both empirically grounded and mathematically sophisticated), enables productive cross-fertilization between the two approaches in their nascent forms. In the beginning Modigliani’s forward-looking procedure (with its focus on foresight) and Simon’s backward-looking model (with its focus on learning) were conceived as complementary rather than antithetical for the development of a concrete decision rule under the hypothesis of incomplete information. The article also discusses Modigliani’s and Emile Grunberg’s contribution to rational expectations, concentrating on the paper they wrote but never published, and Modigliani’s early reaction to Muth’s RET.

“Modigliani’s and Simon’s Early Contributions to Uncertainty (1952-1961)”

RANCAN, Antonella
Primo
Writing – Review & Editing
2013-01-01

Abstract

The article reconstructs Modigliani’s and Simon’s close collaboration over the 1950s on implementation of a decision theory under uncertainty that partly contributed to the genesis of Behavioral Economics and Rational Expectations theory. Their collaboration reveals how the shared identification of uncertainty as a major problem, their similar interpretation of rationality as the ability to select and use relevant information, and their embrace of certain methodological norms for the construction of economic theory (that it should be both empirically grounded and mathematically sophisticated), enables productive cross-fertilization between the two approaches in their nascent forms. In the beginning Modigliani’s forward-looking procedure (with its focus on foresight) and Simon’s backward-looking model (with its focus on learning) were conceived as complementary rather than antithetical for the development of a concrete decision rule under the hypothesis of incomplete information. The article also discusses Modigliani’s and Emile Grunberg’s contribution to rational expectations, concentrating on the paper they wrote but never published, and Modigliani’s early reaction to Muth’s RET.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/4482
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact