Assessing forest biodiversity, naturalness and old-growth status (B-N-OG) is crucial for supporting sustainable forest planning, yet comprehensive monitoring networks specifically designed for such purposes are lacking in many countries. National Forest Inventories (NFIs) are the official source of statistics on status and trends of forests. While initially designed for wood production assessment, NFI data may be pivotal for ecological forest monitoring, thanks to their robust sampling protocols-enabling statistical inference-and regular field campaigns that ensure continuous information updates. As a consequence, in this study we explore the potential of NFIs for estimating B-N-OG indexes, aiming to establish compatible, scientifically relevant, and cost-effective indicators using existing NFI data at a European level. Based on data from the 2005 Italian NFI collected from 6563 plots, 18 indicators were selected following previous experiences and then used to estimate B-N-OG aggregated indexes. Relationships between the 18 indicators and the three indexes were investigated, along with comparisons of their relationships relative to forest type categories, management types and protected versus non-protected areas. Results confirm that NFI data offer valuable insights into specific B-N-OG indexes, especially concerning forest structure and deadwood. Moreover, the indexes contribute to developing meaningful relationships across geographic regions, forest categories and types of management. However, limitations in NFI field protocols are evident, as they are not explicitly designed for certain indicators. The study suggests the potential for NFIs to evolve into accessible, harmonized European reference networks for B-N-OG assessment for better supporting sustainable forest management, planning and conservation decisions related to forest ecosystems.

Country-wide assessment of biodiversity, naturalness and old-growth status using national forest inventory data

Francini, S
;
Parisi, F;Nocentini, S;Travaglini, D;Chirici, G
2023-01-01

Abstract

Assessing forest biodiversity, naturalness and old-growth status (B-N-OG) is crucial for supporting sustainable forest planning, yet comprehensive monitoring networks specifically designed for such purposes are lacking in many countries. National Forest Inventories (NFIs) are the official source of statistics on status and trends of forests. While initially designed for wood production assessment, NFI data may be pivotal for ecological forest monitoring, thanks to their robust sampling protocols-enabling statistical inference-and regular field campaigns that ensure continuous information updates. As a consequence, in this study we explore the potential of NFIs for estimating B-N-OG indexes, aiming to establish compatible, scientifically relevant, and cost-effective indicators using existing NFI data at a European level. Based on data from the 2005 Italian NFI collected from 6563 plots, 18 indicators were selected following previous experiences and then used to estimate B-N-OG aggregated indexes. Relationships between the 18 indicators and the three indexes were investigated, along with comparisons of their relationships relative to forest type categories, management types and protected versus non-protected areas. Results confirm that NFI data offer valuable insights into specific B-N-OG indexes, especially concerning forest structure and deadwood. Moreover, the indexes contribute to developing meaningful relationships across geographic regions, forest categories and types of management. However, limitations in NFI field protocols are evident, as they are not explicitly designed for certain indicators. The study suggests the potential for NFIs to evolve into accessible, harmonized European reference networks for B-N-OG assessment for better supporting sustainable forest management, planning and conservation decisions related to forest ecosystems.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/127619
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact