ObjectivesWe evaluate whether the thrombus aspiration (TA) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may improve STEMI outcomes in hyperglycemic patients.BackgroundThe management of hyperglycemic patients during STEMI is unclear.MethodsWe undertook an observational cohort study of 3166 first STEMI. Patients were grouped on the basis of whether they received TA or not. Moreover, among these patients we selected a subgroup of STEMI patients with hyperglycemia during the event (glycaemia>140mg/dl). The endpoint at 1year included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and re-hospitalization for coronary disease, heart failure and stroke.ResultsOne-thousand STEMI patients undergoing PPCI to plus TA (TA-group) and 1504 STEMI patients treated with PPCI alone (no-TA group) completed the study. In overall study-population, Kaplan-Meier-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mortality rates between patients with and without TA (P=0.065). After multivariate Cox-analysis (HR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.641-1.383) and the addition of propensity matching (HR: 0.86 95% CI 0.412-1.798) TA was still not associated with decreased mortality. By contrast, in hyperglycemic subgroup STEMI patients (TA-group, n=331; no-TA group, n=566), Kaplan-Meier-analysis demonstrated a significantly lower mortality (P=0.019) in TA-group than the no-TA group. After multivariate Cox-analysis (HR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.379-0.963) and the addition of propensity matching (HR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.294-0.984) TA was still associated with decreased mortality.ConclusionsTA was not associated with lower mortality in PPCI for STEMI when used in our large all-comer cohort. Conversely, TA during PPCI for STEMI reduces clinical outcomes in hyperglycemic patients.Trial registration NCT02817542. 25th, June 2016

Thrombus aspiration in hyperglycemic ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients: clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up

Mone, Pasquale;Marfella, Raffaele
2018-01-01

Abstract

ObjectivesWe evaluate whether the thrombus aspiration (TA) before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may improve STEMI outcomes in hyperglycemic patients.BackgroundThe management of hyperglycemic patients during STEMI is unclear.MethodsWe undertook an observational cohort study of 3166 first STEMI. Patients were grouped on the basis of whether they received TA or not. Moreover, among these patients we selected a subgroup of STEMI patients with hyperglycemia during the event (glycaemia>140mg/dl). The endpoint at 1year included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality and re-hospitalization for coronary disease, heart failure and stroke.ResultsOne-thousand STEMI patients undergoing PPCI to plus TA (TA-group) and 1504 STEMI patients treated with PPCI alone (no-TA group) completed the study. In overall study-population, Kaplan-Meier-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mortality rates between patients with and without TA (P=0.065). After multivariate Cox-analysis (HR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.641-1.383) and the addition of propensity matching (HR: 0.86 95% CI 0.412-1.798) TA was still not associated with decreased mortality. By contrast, in hyperglycemic subgroup STEMI patients (TA-group, n=331; no-TA group, n=566), Kaplan-Meier-analysis demonstrated a significantly lower mortality (P=0.019) in TA-group than the no-TA group. After multivariate Cox-analysis (HR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.379-0.963) and the addition of propensity matching (HR: 0.54, 95% CI 0.294-0.984) TA was still associated with decreased mortality.ConclusionsTA was not associated with lower mortality in PPCI for STEMI when used in our large all-comer cohort. Conversely, TA during PPCI for STEMI reduces clinical outcomes in hyperglycemic patients.Trial registration NCT02817542. 25th, June 2016
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/120826
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact