The problem of cultural diversity and coexistence between different beliefs in constitutional democracy is of considerable relevance, given that, to date, it seems difficult to arrive at a legal regime of equal freedom between all individual and collective orientations of a spiritual matrix. That is, despite the positivity of the current constitutional data, various problematic fronts remain unsolved, such as the one concerning the cohabitation relations between adherents to 'historical' religions, 'secular' citizens (that is, not linked to any religious community) and public institutions; the same can be said in reference to the relations between the new associates (in particular, of Islamic faith), the indigenous citizens/faithfuls and the political authorities (theoretically neutral with respect to the different religious traditions).
Il problema della diversità culturale e della convivenza tra le differenti idealità nella democrazia costituzionale è di notevole attualità, dato che, ad oggi, sembra difficile arrivare a un regime giuridico di pari libertà tra tutti gli orientamenti individuali e collettivi di matrice spirituale. Cioè, nonostante la positività degli attuali dati costituzionali, restano irrisolti diversi fronti problematici, come quello relativo ai rapporti di convivenza tra aderenti a religioni “storiche”, cittadini “laici” (cioè non legati ad alcuna comunità religiosa) e istituzioni pubbliche; lo stesso si può dire con riferimento ai rapporti tra i nuovi associati (in particolare, di fede islamica), i cittadini/fedeli autoctoni e le autorità politiche (teoricamente neutrali rispetto alle diverse tradizioni religiose).
Principio di laicità e democrazia pluralista. Continuità e discontinuità nella tutela degli interessi religiosi individuali e collettivi
Parisi Marco
2021-01-01
Abstract
The problem of cultural diversity and coexistence between different beliefs in constitutional democracy is of considerable relevance, given that, to date, it seems difficult to arrive at a legal regime of equal freedom between all individual and collective orientations of a spiritual matrix. That is, despite the positivity of the current constitutional data, various problematic fronts remain unsolved, such as the one concerning the cohabitation relations between adherents to 'historical' religions, 'secular' citizens (that is, not linked to any religious community) and public institutions; the same can be said in reference to the relations between the new associates (in particular, of Islamic faith), the indigenous citizens/faithfuls and the political authorities (theoretically neutral with respect to the different religious traditions).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.