Over the last 25 years both the LEADER initiative and the PRODER programs have sought to reduce territorial disparities between urban and rural areas and between rural areas which are dynamic and depressed, while at the same time contributing to the incorporation of new principles into recent neo‐development theories – endogenous. One of its main objectives, rebalancing, "allowing populations especially weakened or located in areas of the declining territory also benefit from the opportunities presented," has not been achieved as was borne out in previous studies at local, regional and regional level for the province of Granada and Andalusia with the data of the period 2002‐08. Our aim is to see if the distribution of Leader Axis investments during the period 2007‐2013 has been concentrated in the most dynamic rural areas while the deepest and most depressed rural is left out. Comparing the cases of Andalusia, Spain, and Puglia, Italy. For this purpose, the list of projects implemented during the period 2007‐2013 provided by both the Regional Government of Andalusia and the Region of Puglia will be used as a source of basic information.

¿LA PRÁCTICA DEL DESARROLLO RURAL GENERA DESEQUILIBRIO TERRITORIAL? EL CASO DE LEADER EN EL SUR DE EUROPA: ANDALUCÍA (ESPAÑA) Y PUGLIA (ITALIA 2007‐ 2013)

Angelo Belliggiano
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2017

Abstract

Over the last 25 years both the LEADER initiative and the PRODER programs have sought to reduce territorial disparities between urban and rural areas and between rural areas which are dynamic and depressed, while at the same time contributing to the incorporation of new principles into recent neo‐development theories – endogenous. One of its main objectives, rebalancing, "allowing populations especially weakened or located in areas of the declining territory also benefit from the opportunities presented," has not been achieved as was borne out in previous studies at local, regional and regional level for the province of Granada and Andalusia with the data of the period 2002‐08. Our aim is to see if the distribution of Leader Axis investments during the period 2007‐2013 has been concentrated in the most dynamic rural areas while the deepest and most depressed rural is left out. Comparing the cases of Andalusia, Spain, and Puglia, Italy. For this purpose, the list of projects implemented during the period 2007‐2013 provided by both the Regional Government of Andalusia and the Region of Puglia will be used as a source of basic information.
Durante los últimos 25 años tanto la iniciativa LEADER como los programas PRODER han tratado de reducir las disparidades territoriales entre áreas urbanas y rurales, y entre territorios rurales dinámicos y deprimidos a la vez que ha contribuido a incorporar nuevos principios a las recientes teorías del desarrollo neoendógeno. Uno de sus principales objetivos, el de reequilibrar, “permitiendo que poblaciones especialmente debilitadas o situadas en zonas del territorio en declive se beneficien también de las oportunidades planteadas”, no se ha conseguido como se corroboró en anteriores estudios a escala local, comarcal y regional para la provincia de Granada y Andalucía con los datos del periodo 2002‐08. Nuestro objetivo es comprobar si la distribución de las inversiones del Eje Leader durante el periodo 2007‐2013 se han vuelto a concentrar en los territorios rurales más dinámicos mientras el rural profundo y más deprimido queda al margen. Comparándose los casos de Andalcuía, España, y la Puglia, Italia. Para ello se utilizará como fuente de información básica la relación de proyectos ejecutados durante el periodo 2007‐2013 proporcionada tanto por la Junta de Andalucía como por la Región de la Puglia.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11695/71821
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact