It is spoken today of naturalizing phenomenology. This paper argues that this attempt is unrelated to the phenomenology, since how things appear cannot be led back to how our mind is made. At the same time it refuses to regard introspection as a method of phenomenology. This describes, as a matter of fact, inner legalities to the phenomena. This perspective is esemplified through a critic of the neuroscientific notion of simulation. At last, we devepol the notion of giveness, i.e. the idea that experience organizes itself in a temporal way, and that the method of phenomenology is the explication [Auslgung]of this temporal organisation.

La méthode phénoménologique:différences de structure et explicitation intentionnelle

COSTA, Vincenzo
2012-01-01

Abstract

It is spoken today of naturalizing phenomenology. This paper argues that this attempt is unrelated to the phenomenology, since how things appear cannot be led back to how our mind is made. At the same time it refuses to regard introspection as a method of phenomenology. This describes, as a matter of fact, inner legalities to the phenomena. This perspective is esemplified through a critic of the neuroscientific notion of simulation. At last, we devepol the notion of giveness, i.e. the idea that experience organizes itself in a temporal way, and that the method of phenomenology is the explication [Auslgung]of this temporal organisation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11695/1363
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact